Thread: Real Justice.
View Single Post
Old 05-11-2009, 23:44   #11
AntiSilence
Inactive
 
AntiSilence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sutton-In-Ashfield
Age: 48
Services: C#/ASP.NET Web Development
Posts: 3,580
AntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronze
AntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronzeAntiSilence is cast in bronze
Re: Real Justice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
A life sentence is designed to provide both punishment and the possibility of rehabilitation. The tariff ensures there is a minimum period in jail as adequate punishment, but this is only the period they must serve before applying for parole. There's no guarantee of release after that; if they don't convince the parole board they have reformed and no longer pose a risk, then they stay behind bars for as long as it takes.
I realise its the minimum they must serve before they can apply for parole, but it shouldn't be called 'Life'.

It should be, they're sentenced to 12 years... 20 years... etc.

A life sentence should be applied to some crimes, but 'Life' should have it's own terms... Such as a fixed minimum of a big magnitude such as 45 years. If you see what I mean?

I just don't think that they should use the term 'Life' and then say they must serve only 12 (again, an example) years before they can apply for parole (regardless of the chance of it actually being granted).
AntiSilence is offline   Reply With Quote