Thread: First £1,000 rail fare criticised
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2009, 05:54   #7
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 62
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: First £1,000 rail fare criticised
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
On the Cambridge to London trains 'first class' means a carriage where the commoners are not allowed to sit. They also have paper on them that says 'first class'. Stupid.
Its similar on the Brighton to London line, in that "1st class" seats are exactly the same as 2nd, the only advantage of traveling 1st is that you get a guaranteed seat...at only twice the standard fare.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote