View Single Post
Old 31-10-2009, 10:44   #81
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: XL BB 20 meg has dropped to 4 meg HP1 area

There's no congestion anywhere on the route and there's no congestion on VM's core network. That actually takes a pretty direct route and the VM backbone is quite sensibly laid out given the size of the network, it's a quite standard design.

I was merely pointing out that just because a traceroute has a few hops it doesn't indicate a bottleneck or issue and a bit of a trip around the country on uncongested links isn't going to harm speeds even if the route isn't geographically 'optimal'.

Anyway minor digression, suffice to say that the traceroute and core network aren't likely to be an issue in this case.

I must make a mental note not to drink Cognac again too, it appears to cause me to post my thoughts without them going through the sensible part of my brain which usually keeps them to myself.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote