View Single Post
Old 30-10-2009, 19:07   #43
Sir John Luke
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 562
Sir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful oneSir John Luke is the helpful one
Re: Internet "cut off" date set for illegal downloaders

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
If there was the slightest hint that ISPs would have to start doing packet level monitoring of all their data traffic then they'd be up in arms about it because it would cost them an absolute fortune.

...tries to resist.....

Sorry, couldn't resist mentioning Phorm. The ISP's didn't exactly help their arguments against DPI (i.e. packet level monitoring of all their data traffic) when they tried to embrace Phorm, did they?
Sir John Luke is offline   Reply With Quote