Quote:
Originally Posted by Druchii
Not that. It's the way things are going
They offer a service to the paying public, they should be allowed to keep supplying that service despite the backlog these disputes cause.
Now, they normally employ extra people at this time of the year anyway, so, what's wrong with hiring a few more to ensure that the quality of service, and indeed, of the striking workers workload is up to par?
I mean, if they are striking, they're hardly going to love an extensive workload due to their actions. (Am i right in thinking that they were complaining about workloads and the time it takes to complete their normal jobs?).
|
They have employed double the amount of extra people, something seemingly at odds with RM's stance that business is poor don't you think and no they shouldn't be allowed to 'keep suppying the sevice' when a legitimate, legal strike is going on, workers in this country have precious few rights as it is without eroding their one real power.