Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
They were arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.
What exactly was said is unknown to us, the statement given on behalf of the couple (as I said, they've gone to the press) is that they called Mohammed a Warlord and referred to a form of islamic dress as a form of bondage. That could be as accurate as saying Hitler wasn't very fond of Jews.
I see you've resorted to the usual ignorant comment that Mohammed was a paedophile, applying todays values to another time.
You appear to be confused, firstly Islam is not a race, secondly, religions have no rights, people have rights, are you honestly saying that some people should have fewer rights than others because of their religious beliefs?
Oh and just to add, I don't remember seeing in the forum T&Cs a time limit for suggesting a topic title be modified, perhaps you could do me a favour and quote the part that does say that?
|
The act they were arrested under was brought in to deal with different circumstances, the police in this case have imo applied the wrong act.
What they " allegedly " said is fact.
Do you not get that?
My " ignorant " comment is fact too, he was known to have had sex with underage girls, how would you feel if it were your daughter?
I am not confused at all Xaccers, do grow up, it is apparent from the upcoming court case that some people do have less rights than others.
It is seen as fair play for muslims to say what they wish about the christian faith with no action taken, can you not see that either?
Feel free to explain why, given the circumstances, that the title should be changed?
Two sides to every argument Xaccers, which you and some on here seem to ignore conveniently.
---------- Post added at 12:09 ---------- Previous post was at 12:06 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo
Their opinion? Or their faith?
|
Both?
Freedom of speech?
Saaf, is it right that no action is taken over muslim protestors holding blood thirsty placards calling for the death of our troops?
IMO if two people are arrested over a heated debate, regardless what it is about, does it not stink ?
Feel free to answer.