Quote:
Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004
Xaccers, it was not the couple that went to the press, their spokesperson/representative gave the details of what had apparently happened, while the accuser claimed in the press that she had all but been called a terrorist.
Please get your facts right.
In your infinite wisdom, feel free to tell me why they were arrested?
Their arrest followed an alleged discussion about two religions, it seems that to me the one who spat her dummy out when she was faced with some unsavoury truth then decided " Hey! this is england, racist card ! "
They are british?
They are so proud of being British that they hide themselves away and follow a leader who was known for paedophilia?
If you feel happy supporting the rights of that type of religion be my guest.
Why should they have to put up with such disgusting comments?
Because Xaccers not everyone in this country is treated the same, that is why.
Yes its abhorent, but tell me who is to blame?
If I have a gang of yobs outside the door I call the police they are not quick to respond.
But mention that I stayed at a hotel and I was subject to a racist attack and the police are brushing the yobs aside to get to the hotel.
If she did not like what was being said she could have walked away, end of imo.
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=15520
And just to add, if there was a problem with the heading of the post it should have been sorted earlier.
I mean, if you want me to start trawling the topics on this forum for headings that are " questionable given the so called facts " ? |
They were arrested and charged under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 and Section 31 (1) (c) and (5) of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.
What exactly was said is unknown to us, the statement given on behalf of the couple (as I said, they've gone to the press) is that they called Mohammed a Warlord and referred to a form of islamic dress as a form of bondage. That could be as accurate as saying Hitler wasn't very fond of Jews.
I see you've resorted to the usual ignorant comment that Mohammed was a paedophile, applying todays values to another time.
You appear to be confused, firstly Islam is not a race, secondly, religions have no rights, people have rights, are you honestly saying that some people should have fewer rights than others because of their religious beliefs?
Oh and just to add, I don't remember seeing in the forum T&Cs a time limit for suggesting a topic title be modified, perhaps you could do me a favour and quote the part that does say that?