Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Hang on, you're the one who claimed that the couple weren't allowed to go to the press, even though they were the first to do so, and consiquently with healines of "Christians arrested for defending their beliefs" (when the evidence given by the couple and their supporting institute shows that wasn't the case) and the lack of intelligence of the great unwashed, has apparently resulted in several of them using the internet to express their anti-muslim/asian views. We've seen on here the usual unintelligent posts of "they should go back where they came from" even when it's known that the muslims they're talking about are British.
Why should anyone have to put up with such disgusting comments? Because they're muslim? Doesn't wash with me mate.
You'll noticed I used the word "future"
|
Xaccers, it was not the couple that went to the press, their spokesperson/representative gave the details of what had apparently happened, while the accuser claimed in the press that she had all but been called a terrorist.
Please get your facts right.
In your infinite wisdom, feel free to tell me why they were arrested?
Their arrest followed an alleged discussion about two religions, it seems that to me the one who spat her dummy out when she was faced with some unsavoury truth then decided " Hey! this is england, racist card ! "
They are british?
They are so proud of being British that they hide themselves away and follow a leader who was known for paedophilia?
If you feel happy supporting the rights of that type of religion be my guest.
Why should they have to put up with such disgusting comments?
Because Xaccers not everyone in this country is treated the same, that is why.
Yes its abhorent, but tell me who is to blame?
If I have a gang of yobs outside the door I call the police they are not quick to respond.
But mention that I stayed at a hotel and I was subject to a racist attack and the police are brushing the yobs aside to get to the hotel.
If she did not like what was being said she could have walked away, end of imo.
http://www.anglican-mainstream.net/?p=15520
And just to add, if there was a problem with the heading of the post it should have been sorted earlier.
I mean, if you want me to start trawling the topics on this forum for headings that are " questionable given the so called facts " ?