Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
I found it amusing that you used a quote to support your proposition from someone who had campaigned vociferously against the law outlawing incitement to religious hatred - who would have thought he didn't think this prosecution was a bad idea. 
btw, Christian faith also holds the ideals of "love thy neighbour", be respectful of others, and treat others as you would like to be treated - being harangued over the breakfast table by your host seems not to fulfill any of those (imho).
Re Islam and killing unbelievers - funnily enough, there are passages in the Bible (Deuteronomy) saying the same thing; strange you didn't point that out.
 |
I am sure that the quote I used would be said by any lawyer regardless of their beliefs, do you not accept that ?
The couple, just like anyone, can use whoever they wish to defend them in court, is that ok with you ?
" Hang on m'lud, the lawyer is clearly a christian representing a couple of christians, that cannot be right ? "
LMAO.
Yes there have been murders on both sides of the different faiths, but I would place my wages on there being more butchery being committed by the Islam faith.
As recent as 2007 Sheik Ahmad Bahr, acting speaker of the palestinian Legislative Council declared in a sermon at a Sudan Mosque that America and Israel will be annihilated and called upon Allah to kill Jews and Americans " to the very last one "
Sounds just like the type of guy I would enjoy a pint with
But to read some on here, you would think there is only one side to the argument.
This so called offended woman engaged herself in a discussion about religion, as I have said before, if she cannot stand the heat she should stay out the kitchen.
Interesting to note that she has been spouting off to the press while the arrested couple have been told they can say nothing until the case.
But to some on here it is ok, because it gives them the one sided story they want to believe, that there was only one guilty party in all this episode.
From what we have read, mohammed was accused of being a warlord, this is fact, and if somebody feels that the muslim dress is oppressive so what if someone does not like what you wear ?
Sledgehammer/Nut
---------- Post added at 04:44 ---------- Previous post was at 04:37 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
Although, the story doesn't actually mention the muslim woman attacking the Christian beliefs. In fact it doesn't mention what she did, apart from to say she made a complaint. Therefore, we do not know that the Christian faith actually was under attack. If it wasn't, then it didn't need defending and it could be said they were attacking Islam..
|
You like everyone will have to wait and see, but it seems some on here already know the guilty party.
My knowledge in the case is not as good sorry, all I do know is that there are two sides to any argument, and that it's normally the " British " way to listen to two sides of the said argument.
Correct ?
---------- Post added at 04:51 ---------- Previous post was at 04:44 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Well, I've not made any suggestions as to what it should be, only that it doesn't appear to be accurate, last time I checked what they were arrested for at least.
What do you think? Is the title accurate in your opinion?
|
Xaccers, what title would suit you?
Perhaps, " Couple arrested for saying Mohammed was a Warlord " ?
Or " Holy Burkha " !
What do you reckon ?