Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart C
True, although they aren't force feeding it (nor could they).
It's not OK (which is actually why I made the point about Christianity), but what we have seen in the papers suggests that the Christians did all the attacking. I am not saying they did: I do not know.
This is why I said that the thread title is possibly inaccurate. Based on what we have seen so far, there is no evidence to suggest they were defending their beliefs
You are allowed to voice an opinion. You just have responsibilities that go with that right (something that has not actually changed).
We don't know what was said in that argument, but for it to go to court, I suspect it was a lot more serious than just some random comments about Mohammed being a warlord and bondage. I am sure Derek could tell you just how hard it can be to get CPS to prosecute a case.
|
Respect what you're saying stuart.
It could be that the alleged offence had to be put into a box, so to say.
But given what they are allegedly charged for I am confused, because the act was not initially brought in for the circumstances of the case.
We will all just have to wait until the case goes to Court.