View Single Post
Old 28-09-2009, 15:18   #293
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Official CPS policy on the issue
I think that defence covers everything the couple are even accused of. So why were they arrested? Especially as the policy goes on to say
But these people are being investigated under the Public Order Act, designed to prevent anti-social behaviour, of which these two are being accused.

---------- Post added at 16:18 ---------- Previous post was at 16:15 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers View Post
So you would prefer the police to ignite a riot.
Inciting someone is a crime, being incited isn't, acting on that incitement in a criminal way is.
Am I missing something here though, you appear to be suggesting that someone's power to incite others suddenly stops once they're arrested, and those inititially incited would miraculously no longer be incited.
Or are you under the impression that in order to protest, a group must show all their plackards to the police for approval, along with a script of what slogans are going to be shouted, that way the police can stop something before it happens?
I think it would be suggested, by some, that that would only be for certain demonstrations and not others.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote