Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
I don't believe that is the CPS policy on the Crime and Disorder act, nor the Public order act. Oh wait, you're not talking about what the couple are actually accused of are you?
|
It's a cut and paste from the CPS website.
Quote:
|
Annex A - Legislation used to prosecute racist and religious crime
|
---------- Post added at 15:48 ---------- Previous post was at 15:43 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xaccers
So you would prefer the police to ignite a riot.
Inciting someone is a crime, being incited isn't, acting on that incitement in a criminal way is.
|
The point is to stop the incitement taking place in order to prevent further(in the future) violence. That is why incitement is a crime. If removing troublemakers ignites a riot then the protest shouldn't have been allowed to form in the first place. After all the 'peaceful'
organisers/participants would want any troublemakers removed.