View Single Post
Old 28-09-2009, 14:43   #289
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Are you saying you(and the police) can be sure that no violence or murder would take place in the following month as a result? They would also have to track down those who had been 'incited' or 'solicited', which would be impossible as the pictures had broadcast around the world on TV etc.
So you would prefer the police to ignite a riot.
Inciting someone is a crime, being incited isn't, acting on that incitement in a criminal way is.
Am I missing something here though, you appear to be suggesting that someone's power to incite others suddenly stops once they're arrested, and those inititially incited would miraculously no longer be incited.
Or are you under the impression that in order to protest, a group must show all their plackards to the police for approval, along with a script of what slogans are going to be shouted, that way the police can stop something before it happens?
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote