View Single Post
Old 28-09-2009, 13:24   #266
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: Christians arrested for defending their beliefs

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
There was recently, a protest planned and initially approved by the police, but then stopped because of the potential for violence, not from those whose protest was approved, but others. The others were violent anyway even though the first protest didn't really materialize.

But the following month? If incitement is taking place then it has to be stopped there and then, to stop the incitement. It's no good allowing any incitement to take place and then taking action long after the event. If immediate action had taken place, then maybe there might be case for saying that media pressure wasn't responsible for the arrests but as the arrests, that did take place, happened a very long time(relatively) afterwards, there can't.
Well, seeing as (going by your logic) violence hadn't broken out, then they could hardly be accused of inciting it then.
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote