[Flyboy]

Originally Posted by arcamalpha2004

I am not making any judgement on " religious " people being offended, we are all made of the same stuff whoever you pray to, so I could go to a national paper, as the complainant has in their case and complain of being all but treated like a terrorist.

The victim in this case was not the one who went to the papers. It was the accused, at the behest of the Christian Institute. Now I would have thought that even a hint of their involvement would start to ring alarm bells. A lot has been written about the woman, who was on the receiving end of this couple's wrath, but there is precious little about the couple themselves. I wonder why the likes of the Daily Heil, The Sexpress and the Torygraph haven't delved into their background and bothered finding out anything about them?

Which is a strange thing really, because for apparent legal reasons the accused cannot say anything until the case goes to court but the alleged " offended " can.
When people decide to get involved in something so touchy as religious discussions things can get heated,

Which I would have thought, as experience service providers such as these, should have known better to have not even started a discussion on the subject.

the alleged " offended " apparently gave as good as she got but then decided to sculk off to the police and complain.
It was allegedly said by the accused that mohammed was a warlord, is that not true?

How do you know this? She was recovering from an operation, I hardly think she was in much of a position to "give as good as she got." But, on the presumption that this is what happened, what would you have expected her to have done? Just sit there meekly and take the abuse that was allegedly thrown at her?

The people who decide in court will look at what was apparently said about mohammed and probably scratch their heads wondering why they are even sat where they are that particular day wasting everyones time.

But it is more than what was said about Mohammed, she was insulted by their assertions that her religious dress was oppressive and some kind of bondage. I dare say the was a whole lot more said than that as well, but we only the Daily Heil's et al version of what they want us to know.

I have read a lot of opinions on other forums over the case and to be honest there is not a lot of sympathy for the alleged " offended "

Yes, I am sure you have, but then I don't think Stormfront's collective opinion holds much of an independent perspective to be honest. But I am sure they are just a little more than confused, to hear the the accused is an immigrant and the victim is a British born white woman.

A lot of people see it as I do, that she has not liked the heat, but instead of getting out the kitchen has decided to, or her husband has persuaded her, to go to the police.
This whole story is symptomatic of the pc country we now live in where our national identity is being stripped layer by layer.

I am sure a lot of people do see it as you do, but then I am sure there a lot of people who would rather Muslims were not allowed to stay in guest houses where white Christians go, but there you go.

This has nothing to do with an imagine PC conspiracy, what it has to do with is an individual's right, to live their lives as they wish, unharassed and unhindered by someone's yobbish behaviour and bigoted opinions.

As far as her husband is concerned, reading the woman's words, she sounds as though she has a mind of her own in these matters and her husband has little influence over her decisions. Which kind of flies in the face of the accused assertion that she was under some kind of bondage.