Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Well No, But that is what is the case is about. Since you decided to make a judgement on religious people being offended I pointed out that the accusation in this case is different to the example you give.
|
I am not making any judgement on " religious " people being offended, we are all made of the same stuff whoever you pray to, so I could go to a national paper, as the complainant has in their case and complain of being all but treated like a terrorist.
Which is a strange thing really, because for apparent legal reasons the accused cannot say anything until the case goes to court but the alleged " offended " can.
When people decide to get involved in something so touchy as religious discussions things can get heated, the alleged " offended " apparently gave as good as she got but then decided to sculk off to the police and complain.
It was allegedly said by the accused that mohammed was a warlord, is that not true?
The people who decide in court will look at what was apparently said about mohammed and probably scratch their heads wondering why they are even sat where they are that particular day wasting everyones time.
I have read a lot of opinions on other forums over the case and to be honest there is not a lot of sympathy for the alleged " offended "
A lot of people see it as I do, that she has not liked the heat, but instead of getting out the kitchen has decided to, or her husband has persuaded her, to go to the police.
This whole story is symptomatic of the pc country we now live in where our national identity is being stripped layer by layer.