Quote:
Originally Posted by zantarous
But weren't all the utility companies built using tax payer money? Sky had to invest private money into the venture. Comparing MS to Sky is like apples and oranges. Would you be so eager if the government forced Virgin to open their cable network to rivals so they could all deliver broadband or TV over fibre?
|
Cable is not national so there is no competieotn issues there, but i acutally think virign should open there network up as they make mroe money and we get mroe channels as the channels pay for the bandwidht and the epg.
I agree sky invest so should get money back like BT are for Fibre, but bt isnt allowed to get it at there price forever i hikn it for about 3-5 years. so sky should be no different they get the money back which they have for the investment in red button and hd then there price are set at regulator price not sky price, but the problem is sky does nto want anyone to compete they want the totally domiance and that why thye hould be forced.