Quote:
Originally Posted by hedgie
The Singapore Piquet "Crashgate" looks like it might have some mileage in it, this transcript from an FIA interview stinks  . There might be an innocent explanation for refusing to answer questions but there is an old saying "no smoke without fire"
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78647
Plus another saying, innocent until proved guilty 
Hope this gets sorted out, I'm getting bored of trying to defend the sport I have followed for 25 years..... |
With the announcement today about Briatore and Symmonds it looks on balance, we now in the "no smoke without fire" territory.
More detail here;
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78580
and here.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/78668
Lets say Renault nee Benetton have form
when it comes to exploiting the rules. They were the first to try and argue Launch Control was not traction control and then there was the pit lane refuelling accident with Jos Verstappen; the investigation found that the team had removed components from the standard FIA fuel rig which had a side effect of causing an incease fuel flow (Hence shorter pitstops)