Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
From the article in the OP
|
I did read that but I think its a long way from impartiality. The BNP formed in 1982, only 27 years later being considered? If they were impartial they would have made sure all parties got equal exposure or at the very least some exposure.
And also if no parties can dictate who cannot be on the show, why the need for "talks" with other parties?
I can understand why the BBC doesn't want to touch the BNP - its a PR nightmare for them. However they can't then claim to be impartial by excluding them.