View Single Post
Old 28-08-2009, 13:30   #101
danielf
cf.mega poser
 
danielf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,687
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
danielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden auradanielf has a golden aura
Re: Bring Back Fox Hunting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
And so denying them of their livelihood is not a big issue? Nothing to concern ourselves with?
I didn't say that.

Quote:
So at what level do you believe it becomes worthy of recognition?????

Should we set a sliding scale?

How about if it only affects less than a thousand then they can just go a whistle.

1000-5000 we listen sympathetically

over 5000 we'll become outraged.

Yes, that's fair.
No-one said it's fair. It is the way of the world though. Any decision is bound to impact on others, and there will always be a tradeoff between people's interests. Number of people affected will feed into that tradeoff.
__________________
Remember kids: We are blessed with a listening, caring government.
danielf is offline   Reply With Quote