View Single Post
Old 21-08-2009, 11:16   #46
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: Lockerbie bomber released

Don't get me wrong, if he had been found guilty beyound reasonable doubt, then he should have stayed in prison. The fact is that there is a lot of doubt surrounding his conviction.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Saaf_laandon_mo View Post
Do people here opposing to his release believe he did it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem View Post
I'd have thought the answer to that is evidently yes. In the eyes of the law he is guilty, of course, but having now abandoned his appeal it's doubtful we'll ever find out whether there was a miscarriage of justice. Some will argue his release was agreed simply in order to save HMG's embarrassment....
Can I rephrase my original question.

Do those opposed to his release genuinely believe that, given all the doubt surrounding his trial and conviction, he should have been convicted of the bombing?
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline   Reply With Quote