View Single Post
Old 21-08-2009, 10:05   #43
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: Lockerbie bomber released

Do people here opposing to his release believe he did it? I was not interested in politics when it happened and didn't follow the details of the trial or the subsequent follow up. However having read some of the information from the links posted, as well as the recent press, I would say that there was so much doubt surrounding his conviction that he should not have been locked up in the first place, or been allowed to stay in prison for so long.

So are all the people complaining that he is back in Libya and escaped punishment saying he is guilty?

On page 15 of today's Sun there is a picture of him getting off the plane in Libya with a huge headline across the page saying, "Final Insult". The one page article makes no reference to the doubts surrounding his conviction. It does not suprise me with media coverage like this going out to the masses, that so many people think, "Yes he is guilty. String the ******* up!"
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline   Reply With Quote