View Single Post
Old 18-08-2009, 10:10   #45
Nugget
Inactive
 
Nugget's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Punmeister Towers
Age: 50
Services: Will provide gags for cash
Posts: 9,211
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Nugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered starsNugget is seeing silvered stars
Re: disability living allowance

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAROLWHITIE View Post
Crooked doctors my well be the least of the problem but they exist, bought and paid for by the DWP in order to short change you. Normally these are retire old dinosaurs and usually drunks and are there to do you no favours only to get you off DLA.

TAKE AS YOU WISH AS LONG AS YOU ARE AWARE.

---------- Post added at 10:05 ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 ----------




the correct word is libellous and there can be no libel in the truth. Besides do you think anyone is stupid enough to post what they can not substantiate. I can substantiate all i post and if you want a few doctors names who are in the pocket of the dwp email me for them.

The governmnet loves you sort...believe all they tell you.
A sweeping generalisation that the doctors in question are 'usually drunks' is, indeed, libellous, in that you've written it down in your post. However, if you're willing to put it on here, you've probably uttered it to other people, making it slanderous.

As a point of fact (and having known a few of the doctors in question), I'd argue that the ones in your area might be 'on the take' (to coin a phrase), but they're definitely not round here.

That's the problem with sweeping generalisations - they tend to get caught out when you take into account the remaining 90% of the people you're referring to...
Nugget is offline   Reply With Quote