View Single Post
Old 14-08-2009, 15:12   #13
Pierre
Permanently Banned
 
Pierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: floating in the ether
Posts: 13,332
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Pierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny starsPierre has a pair of shiny stars
Re: [MERGED] Virgin Media Second Quarter 2009 Results

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
It's the bit where they said they gained 5,100. That's vastly less than the 54,000 they gained in the same period last year, and the 47,000 they gained in the first quarter of this year. And, by contrast, Sky has just added 124,000 customers.

So yes, by all comparisons they have gained 'virtually no customers'. These are disappointing figures for VM.
I wouldn't argue that the net adds are bit disappointing and quite unfathomable why it should be so low for this quarter.

Yet with "virtually" no additions revenues are up across the board - go figure.

I would like to see the % split of our on-net broadband v other adsl providers. Sky's numbers are good but I would like to see how they compare against cable broadband.

I was once a customer of Sky and can vouch that I found them to be very good, but if I lived in a cables area I'd drop them, and other provider, like a stone.

Virgin need to improve their off-net adsl proposition in order to increase their customer base.
Pierre is offline   Reply With Quote