View Single Post
Old 09-08-2009, 03:34   #3
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 61
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: UK 'may have 40-year Afghan role'

The real sad part of all this is that Britain has already fought two unsuccessful Afghan wars in the nineteenth century, surely history would have taught any invading army/coallition that no matter how well intentioned your on to a hiding for nothing.
We are fighting in the Talibans backyard, they aren't going anywhere, the only way this conflict can be resolved is politically not through military force.
And when we are dealing with a government that is as corrupt as Karsi's it doesn't instill confidence.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote