View Single Post
Old 09-07-2009, 20:42   #18
Tezcatlipoca
Inactive
 
Tezcatlipoca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 16,760
Tezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny stars
Tezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny starsTezcatlipoca has a pair of shiny stars
re: Photographing the police (Come on Derek...smile :D)

The Met have issued "Guidelines" regarding photography:

http://www.met.police.uk/about/photography.htm

It covers not just the use of the new law (Section 76 of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008, which amended the Terrorism Act 2000 with Section 58a) regarding photographing police officers, but also the use of Section 43 & Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Telegraph journo Kate Day has blogged about it:

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/culture...hotograph-who/

Apparently the Met's advice is not Home Office approved:

http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...ws_285926.html


Another article at The Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...sm-regulations

It includes some examples of Section 76 being used to stop photography of the police.

It also has a link to a blog post by someone who was arrested (& later eventually "de-arrested") under Section 44 after taking photographs in Chatham High Street:

http://monaxle.com/2009/07/08/sectio...m-high-street/
Tezcatlipoca is offline   Reply With Quote