Quote:
Originally Posted by royaltiger
Virgin had the choice to go with mpeg4 but opted to use mpeg2 instead, that was the first sign of a lack of inteligence and investment in technology from virgin, what they should be doing now is replacing the old V+ and passing that onto customers with just the standard samsung set top, and introducing a V+ with the latest technology built in, including a blu-ray player and a hard drive capacity of at least the size of a terrabyte, then people might start to take them seriously but we all know its not going to happen, when you cannot negotiate to get ITV HD or channel4 when its launched you know your on a loser. Unfortunately the latest technology offering from Virgin is +1 channels which they seem to think is the icing on the cake in their tv department, I think I have now come up with a better technical offering, and it will alse free up this so called precious bandwith,why dont we scrap the normal channels and just keep the +1 channels but treat them as normal channels , I am sure it will work ,until some bright spark of course reintroduces the +1 system again.
|
dnt talk mince, they do not need to provide a bluray player and 1tb hard disk space, sky do not have itv hd and jsut because oyu can manually tune it is not the same thing. virgin was not about when there hd box launched that was telewest, they do not need to scrap +1 channels there plent yof bandwidht to launch quite a few hd channels oin mpeg2
you clearly have no clue on how the system works