Andrew, It's a fair point about it being a PVR but when your leading technology can only muster 1HD channel but your willing to spend millions on a Red sock, priorities are worng somewhere....
I await the response of about me being proactive virign support (ha like am just neutralk and say it as it really is even if it bad to virgin or good) - i don't understand mate, was this directed at me?
---------- Post added at 13:23 ---------- Previous post was at 13:17 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen
Anyone in 'this game' as you put it and has a good understanding of how business' are run would know that budgets are set aside for things and its not simply a case of 'they could have spent that money on HD' they have individual budgets for everything so money they spent on rebranding and what not will not affect VM's plans for HD!
|
Nonsense!
The collective budget is broken up into individual budgets for each section of the company... therefore they decide how much the Advertising budget is and how much the HD budget is... therefore someone HAD to decided how much went into the glove puppet Budget when they could have decided to put more into the HD budget.
It's a ridiculous use of their money! Can anyone honestly say that V1 is now vastly different to what it was apart from it's a red puppet and not a red Post box???
It's about priorties and Virgin at present want to wow us all with Elmo lite in the vain hope we forget about everything else LOL....