View Single Post
Old 02-06-2009, 23:36   #14
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by BexTech View Post
They sure do have a lot of money, VM would be crazy to sell to Sky, what would Sky do then, likely charge an arm and a leg for VM to carry the channels and therefore VM then losing the channels completely for months or years just like the Sky basics.
Or VM sell to Sky conditionally on keeping access to those and whatever other channels for x years, they get cash from the channels and keep access to them, Sky get more for their world domination plans.

Makes perfect sense to me and I suspect to both companies.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote