View Single Post
Old 13-05-2009, 22:06   #940
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 62
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: Coming Soon to Virgin TV (2009)

Quote:
Originally Posted by moroboshi View Post
The notion of taking an established brand (UKTV), flushing it down the toilet, and creating a fractured mess of random and utterly retarded channel names defies all logic. It's the polar opposite of how to create a brand.
I was beginning to think I was the only one who thought that! at least before all these channels had the the prefix UKTV the public were aware they were the same brand, now they are a loose smattering of channels that it looks like a eight year old has named.
Add to all this the time and money this entire exercise has cost, and you begin to wonder if there is anybody at the helm.
frogstamper is offline