View Single Post
Old 11-05-2009, 21:33   #17
Matth
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Services: BB:M, TV:XL, Phone:M, Loyalty
Posts: 2,516
Matth has reached the bronze age
Matth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze ageMatth has reached the bronze age
Re: Would a NIC be better than onboard ethernet ?

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ernet,800.html

The implementation and quality of the onboard can vary, if it's piped through the PCI subsystem, then it will be no better or worse than a similar controller on a PCI card, and it will probably be the most basic.

If it is connected at a higer level, then the issue of PCI bus load is avoided.

Interesting, the Intel Pro/1000 PCI card did pretty well too, my old machine had a Pro/100 card (well, same chipset) and it was smooth - the tuning options allow a good degree of interrupt reduction.
Matth is offline   Reply With Quote