View Single Post
Old 11-05-2009, 06:38   #12
Druchii
cf.mega poster
 
Druchii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oslo, Norway.
Age: 36
Services: Canal Digital: 50/10
Posts: 7,577
Druchii has a nice shiny star
Druchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny starDruchii has a nice shiny star
Re: Would a NIC be better than onboard ethernet ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragon View Post
It's not the speed, its the CPU utilization for a given level of throughput and as I said it's only some chipsets that aren't good for it.

Generally you probably wouldn't notice it in a desktop environment but you might on a firewall box.

At 1Gbit I find it's usually the drives that bottleneck before anything else.
With a 3.6Ghz C2D then i can see why i wouldn't notice a difference. Good call on the firewall box scenario though.
Druchii is offline   Reply With Quote