Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
You're entitled to your opinion, and you're right this is a discussion forum, not the Old Bailey. But while you're moaning about the way I phrase my posts, bear in mind that it cuts both ways. Perhaps you think my approach to the subject is too clinical. Well maybe it is, but on the other hand I think your approach is based in bile, anger and a desire for vengeance, not justice. Thankfully our criminal justice system doesn't work like that. If you think that's wrong, then by all means go on saying so, but please don't be surprised if some of us strongly disagree with you.
|
you are funny Chris
you often pull people up on how they post. You did it me a few posts ago cuz I missed out a word
and you think you aint self righteous lmao
---------- Post added at 10:48 ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Chris is not arguing for the perpetrator. He is just not arguing exclusively from the victim's family's point of view. He is arguing from a neutral standpoint. Justice has to be done, and it has been but it should be proportionate to the crime. It may not seem so when you look at it purely from the point of view of someone losing their life but it's important to remember he did not mean to cause a death.
|
I agree he did not mean to cause the death but he was the cause of the death. I did not mean to nearly kill that woman but I nearly did it was my fault