Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
I so have to bow down to your greater intellect with my lesser grammar
You argue your point no differently to me. You are no more flexible with your beliefs than I am. You hold on to what you think no matter what anyone else says. You argue in this case for the perp I am backing the victim and her family. We are opposing sides of the same argument.
You called those like me self righteous therefore as you are doing exactly the same as me but from an opposite side what does that make you??
I openly admit that I am bigoted when it comes to my view. Your lack of tolerance for my view and devotion to your view makes you what??
Of course you will say you disagree with what I say but then we will just start the opposing sides thing again
|
Chris is not arguing for the perpetrator. He is just not arguing exclusively from the victim's family's point of view. He is arguing from a neutral standpoint. Justice has to be done, and it has been but it should be proportionate to the crime. It may not seem so when you look at it purely from the point of view of someone losing their life but it's important to remember he did not mean to cause a death.