Quote:
Originally Posted by AbyssUnderground
I'd prefer Option 1 but with higher caps. Why? I'm on 10Mbps (L) and I use 300GB/month on average already. A lower cap than that would make it hard for me even if the speed is 1/4.
50Mbps - 1000GB
20Mbps - 750GB
10Mbps - 500GB
10Mbps (M) - 150GB
2Mbps - 30GB
|
I would not agree that it's reasonable to expect 500GB for 25 quid a month. The discrepancy between M and L is also massive given the small price difference. Appreciate it's a matter of personal choice but think the expectation of 500GB is unrealistic and the jump from M to L is also unrealistic.
If you want 300GB I'd be wanting more of your cash
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinglebarb
I want the STM in place how it was or is being trialed
|
Part of the reason I went into more depth on other things is that I think STM as it is is unfair and doesn't work. After 9PM my area hits a serious go slow due to STM clicking off and people starting their leechery, and it punishes people who may have a brief spike of heavy utilisation while allowing people, perhaps like yourself, nothing personal
, whose bandwidth requirements run into hundreds of GB a month to go untouched as your usage is all non-interactive and you can schedule outside of STM hours.
Thanks for the feedback though Zing I can imagine it being a very common thought among people whose requirements are for a lot of bandwidth.