View Single Post
Old 17-04-2009, 16:35   #1326
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,403
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: The existence of God

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRZ400 View Post
You can teach 'morals' without religion, to imply otherwise is stupid.
Nobody is suggesting otherwise. What we are suggesting, however, is that you pick and choose what you call 'brainwashing' based on your own personal tastes and beliefs.

Please tell me:
1. Do you support the rights of parents to bring their children up as strict vegans?
2. Do you support the rights of parents to bring their children up to respect the laws of England?

Quote:
Watch the first minute and come back on here and tell me this isn't brainwashing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbZ155AiX9U
Round and round like a hamster on a wheel. Maybe you're still amused by it but I'm not playing your games thanks.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas T View Post
No, it doesn't.

I was just asking a question. Is there a problem with that?
Questions - no. But if you want to ask a question at a tangent from the main discussion, it's probably not a good idea to do it by pressing the 'quote' button. It tends to make people assume you're responding to something - which clearly in this case you weren't - and simply results in confusion.

---------- Post added at 17:35 ---------- Previous post was at 17:33 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar View Post
Could we have one without the emotive and disdainful language, please?
Of course you can't, DRZ isn't here to hold a rational discussion, he's here to use certain other participants in this thread as proxies onto whom he can vent a lot of personal anger and frustration. I posted earlier to ask him what it is in his past that's made him so angry, but he's ignoring me. Fair enough, I suppose, but I plan to remind him of the fact the next time he accuses someone else of failing to answer his 'questions'.
Chris is offline