View Single Post
Old 16-04-2009, 10:09   #93
akki007
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Republic of Manchunia
Services: TiVo XL, L BB, L Phone
Posts: 256
akki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to allakki007 is a name known to all
Re: An email from Neil Berkett re: VM HD Channels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
Why should you get one price? All of Sky's channels are bundled or packaged in one way or another. And no, SD and HD are not the same. The HD version of the channel requires more processing and more bandwidth from the satellite. The extra costs are real, not simply some imaginary figure pulled out of a hat to screw more money out of the subs. Granted they may use a single set of HD cameras at the venue and then downsample for the SD broadcast, but those cameras cost money - a lot of money - and Sky has opted to make those people who are able to benefit from the extra detail they capture, pay for it.

What's the relevance of this?
Would you pay more for ITV than Bravo because of the higher bitrate?
akki007 is offline   Reply With Quote