View Single Post
Old 15-04-2009, 15:20   #1201
Saaf_laandon_mo
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Saaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny starSaaf_laandon_mo has a nice shiny star
Re: The existence of God

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B View Post
It's a stereotypical view of believers though. I haven't seen any post from a believer which implies they are in any way a 'better' person than an atheist.

Maybe not, but I have seen quite a few posts saying that religion formed a framework or morals and ethics (and as a result bettered society)which would have been missing had religion not arrived. I've been guilty of using that argument myself in the past.

Let's take a view on adultery for example. Did people stop commiting adultery because Jesus or Muhammed told them too? What about those that weren't commiting adultery in the first place? I know plenty of religious people who have a bit on the side and hope for forgiveness on the Day of Judgement. And I know a lot of athiests who would never look at another women even though they dont believe that they will be punished for it. Did we really need religion to form a moral framework? Or are morals just a feature of people irregardless of the God (or lack of God) they follow?
Saaf_laandon_mo is offline