Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ B
I think a better anaology would be if an atheist stood up in a pub and asked of any believers could answer his question. More and more joined in on either side including a few atheist who perhaps have had a bit too much to drink as they'd clearly left their manners at the door.
|
Any analogy that suits could be used Russ.
that's what happens when you discuss religion. some people discuss the logic of it all, and if this and that were the case then how did that and this make it possible. nobody really has the answers. you don't have the answers. the answers you have are what you believe. and that's where it all goes the way it does when discussing religion. there's a fullstop on being able to answer a logical question.
Why then? because I believe it to be. is the discussion when involving both sides.
Why then? because it might be. is the discussion when involving one side.
Why then? is never asked when involving the other side of the one side.
that is just the way it always goes, and will never change I don't think.