View Single Post
Old 09-04-2009, 08:25   #851
Russ
cf.mega poster
 
Russ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,181
Russ has a golden aura
Russ has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden auraRuss has a golden aura
Re: The existence of God

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRZ400 View Post
No you didn't ....
Really? Let me point it out for you seeing as you have such a bad memory....

From this post...

Quote:
By the way the bible doesn't mention dinosaurs either
I replied 'yes it does'.

The response to that was this. ("link please")

I then linked to a site (http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/dinos.shtml) which I thought would be better than quoting directly from the bible.

So, just prove to you (yet again) that dinosaurs are mentioned in the Bible, these are the direct passages..... Job 40:15-18 if you can be bothered to look for yourself..

Quote:
Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.
So yes, I have proven to you that going on that description, dinosaurs are mentioned in the Bible.

"But Russ, the words 'dinosaur' itself isn't actually mentioned LOL so the Bible must be fake LOL"

Well that's because the word 'dinosaur' wasn't invented until the 1800 but going on that description it matches many dinosaurs and no known creature of today.

---------- Post added at 09:25 ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by danielf View Post
Yes, that's fair enough. But on the subject of Evolution, I think it's fair enough to sat that interpretations differ? I know (well, that's my understanding anyway) that the Vatican endorses Evolution (I'm not sure how they reconcile this with Adam, Eve et al.), while many Protestants prefer a more literal interpretation?
If anything I'd say it's the other way around. Catholics tend to be more traditionalist. I don't know what the Vatican's stance is on evolution (it only speaks for Catholicism, it has nothing to do with the rest of us) but none of the Christians I know have much of a problem with evolution.
__________________
From Jim Cornette:
“Ty, Fy, bye”

Russ is offline