Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
And the relevance is?
I was highlighting that some people don't think it's a confrontational battle between science and religion, and that it doesn't have to be antagonistic.
Oh, the irony.
|
Well they are right in that it doesn't have to be antagonistic.
I do however recognise a few of those names and non-antagonistic are not the words I would use to describe them. It's another political maneuver, the article would have been far better if it was simply anonymous.