Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
Maggy pointed out there were lots of historical documentation proving that the person Jesus actually existed - you responded by saying "But other than we have to believe because it has to be true?" No on said that we had to believe because it has to be true, people were saying (imho) we should believe Jesus existed because of historical documentation; which I why pointed out to you that you were (imho) twisting what posters had said.
|
No you are reading it the way you want it to read.
Maggy says there were lots of documentation
proving
I said so apart from it has to be true because of this documentational proof, what else is there to prove it.
You don't want to see that. you want it to say something to suit your argument.
---------- Post added at 16:25 ---------- Previous post was at 16:23 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by foreverwar
There is a major difference, imho, between "sitting on the fence" and being deliberately provocative, obtuse, and twisting peoples statements to try and back up the poster's shifting positions.
|
You just come across as a bad loser. you constantly keep trying to influence others to your way of thinking of what isn't happening
