Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I understand that those facts are all anyone knew at the time this thread began. What you need to understand is that for justice to be done, you need to know more than that before you pass judgement.
|
But you are basically saying that they can't have an opinion based on the these facts. we have to wait till we hear both sides before we are allowed to.
The facts so far are the facts he gave himself.
I can pass judgement on anyone without hearing their defence.
Your saying that for justice to be done, you need to know more than that before you pass judgement is wrong when we are not a jury, and you are not the judge making that comment.
You personally can say that you won't make judgement until you hear both sides, but you can't tell everyone that they have to do the same.
Justice isn't an opinion, which is what most of us are debating. even the ones with the opposing opinion
