Quote:
Originally Posted by Moldova
The quotes below are taken from this article and the bottom quote says it all.
http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/north...03-23285471/2/
The decision to keep the Volvo’s alarms and warning lights off only increased the threat the officer posed, the jury was told.
And the way Dougal “hunted” the Megane even though he had no information about the reason it had triggered the computer system was out of proportion.
“Put simply, our case is that his driving at such extreme speed at night in a residential area was highly dangerous,” he told the jury. “It was even more dangerous to do so without using any special warning devices.”
The jury heard the information that triggered the computer “hit” about the Megane was finally found to be out of date. Its driver, a Czech national with two relatives as passengers, had been driving normally and within the 30mph limit, even seeing the dreadful collision in his rear view mirror. |
No, it does
not say it all. It says the prosecution's case. So it says about half of it.
For goodness sake, why is this so hard for you to grasp?
