Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Reasonable conclusions based on the information revealed in court so far Zing, but as I keep saying, you're only hearing the prosecution case at the moment. It is the job of the barrister acting for the CPS to paint a compelling picture of guilt.
It is far better to wait until the prosecution's arguments are balanced out by those of the defence. After that, this bloke may well be shown to be guilty as hell, but the fact is we just don't have all the facts yet.
|
He does not contest the fact he left the blues and twos off as to not alert the megan. He does not contest that he was driving at 90 mph braked and still hit the girl at 80mph. So he was traveling a residential area at 90mph with no warning he was there . No contest to that. So we can all judge him on that information as he agrees yes?
I judge that even if he is not found guilty he was reckless driving at such speeds with no warning fair enough?