View Single Post
Old 24-03-2009, 12:29   #69
Flyboy
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,375
Flyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful oneFlyboy is the helpful one
Re: steve bottomley sacked..do we have the right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post
my point is that if anyone wants to join a political organisation no matter how unsavioury then they should be aloud to as a matter of basic freedom but if they are proven to abuse the trust or authority that goes with that position then they should be dealt with by the courts or disciplinary procedures
Ithink it's a shame that a good officer has been lost to the force when they need as many as they can get
No one is stopping anyone from joining the BNP (except the BNP). Steve Bettley can join the BNP if he wants. He just can't be a police officer as well. The Merseyside Police Authority have explained the reasons for his dismissal and that should be enough. If this term in his contract was unfair, don't you think it would have been challenged by now?

---------- Post added at 13:20 ---------- Previous post was at 13:06 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by martyh View Post

he didn't join his brother did it as part of a family offer to get free membership this hasn't been disputed so we have to take it as true
Yes it has been disputed, by the MPA. If this was the case, he has had nearly six months to present this evidence. He hasn't, so the only conclusion is that he joined of his own free will. What happened to his mail, all the e-mails, his membership card and welcome pack, during this time? If a "family member" enrolled him without his consent, the family member has committed a criminal offence.

Quote:
the BNP is not a banned organisation if it was banned then no-one would be able to vote for them
It is a proscribed organisation by the home office.

Quote:
just because someone joins a political party it does not mean they support all their ideals.Alot of the general population are becomming increasingly sympathetic to SOME of the BNP's ideals whether they admit it or not that doesn't mean they want to kick all non whites out of the country
Nonsense. Are you telling us that people join this party even though they know full well of its racist agenda, its racist policies, manifesto and constitution. The fact that it blocks blacks, Asians and Muslims from joining. Do they ignore this and still join them?

People join this party because they are racist, there can be no other reason.

---------- Post added at 13:29 ---------- Previous post was at 13:20 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by punky View Post
Just because you think and want it to be a racist organisation, doesn't mean it is. Whether you like it or not the BNP is a legal political party. Unless you want to go down the political route of countries like Zimbabwe and just ban any political parties that have a different ideology.
But they are a racist party. I don't understand why that is in contention. They have a racist manifesto. They have a racist constitution. They have a racist memebrship recruitment policy. How much more racism do you need, in order to be called a racist?
Flyboy is offline   Reply With Quote