Quote:
Originally Posted by Kymmy
If they rejected the couple of sexual orientation then in simple terms the hotel was wrong to refuse the rooms based on the current laws... If they don't like the current laws then they have a simple right to set up a hotel elsewhere that doesn't have the laws or start up a business which doesn't have such laws..
The warning on the website is that it states 'a marraige between Man & a Women'..It doesn't then give any scope for civil partnerships (even once performed in a church) nor does it give leeway for foriegn single sex marraiges..
It's not as if it's a brand new law and has been in force a couple of years now..
If it was based on Christianity then why also doesn't it restrict against thost married in a registry office...or perhaps unbaptized individuals
|
because Christians recognise state marriages ( there isnt really any need to get married in a church ( except maybe for Catholics ) as there is no bible section on how to get married )
there is however a European law that says they are allowed to manifest thier faith the way they see fit
see hear where this was upheld when a greak court went against the convention
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...3-1492004.html
there are too competing freedoms here and if this was about refusing to let them in it would one thing ( thats to do with the black coment on refusing service ) but this is not its about what they want going on under thier roof
if they had seperate rooms just as would have been asked of them as an unmarried couple they could have staid