LOL, everyones grabbing at the "civil partnership" side of my quotes when the most relevant word is "Hetrosexual" My argument is (and that's why I brought in that civil partnerships is not jus same sex to guide people AWAY from the marraige/single/partnership issue) that yes it would have been OK if the couple had stuck to thier website wording and restricted "unmarried couples" Instead the reason for rejection for this couple was as in the article as
Quote:
|
but when they arrived were told that only married heterosexual couples could stay in the same room
|
By that quote they are discriminating against a couple sexuality