View Single Post
Old 23-03-2009, 21:14   #52
frogstamper
Inactive
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brighton
Age: 62
Services: VIP
Posts: 3,705
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
frogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronzefrogstamper is cast in bronze
Re: steve bottomley sacked..do we have the right?

[QUOTE=martyh;34760621]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyboy View Post
On what grounds? It was a legal and fair dismissal. He broke his terms and conditions of employment.

the whole point of this discusion is are those terms and conditions legal do the police or indeed any other employer have the right to impose them ...no they don't imo
If its a question of "do we have the right to impose these rules on police officers", then in my opinion of course we do.
As already pointed out by Derek would be police officers are made well aware of this ruling before they start their careers, how comfortable would any of us feel if this was a Muslim officer who was found out to be a member of some legal Islamic hate group?
From a personal point of view I wouldn't want either of them in a position of authority.
frogstamper is offline   Reply With Quote