Thread: STM
View Single Post
Old 22-03-2009, 16:08   #21
Ignitionnet
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Age: 47
Posts: 13,995
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Ignitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny starsIgnitionnet has a pair of shiny stars
Re: STM

I would imagine that the natural answer, as a customer, is that it's gotten rid of.

What it might cost VM to do this isn't the consumer's problem, that it was introduced at the time of the 10->20Mbit upgrades made it very clear that it was introduced so that VM could deploy that upgrade as they didn't have the capacity, as also evidenced by the large amount of capacity introduced since the upgrade.

The obvious answer for me is to get rid. If they have an issue with the manner in which some customers use the service deal with them individually, and/or stop selling the service as unlimited.
Ignitionnet is offline   Reply With Quote